i haven't seen any of the saw films. maybe mostly because i heard they lacked a plot. i was brought up on crazy materials, like 'faces of death', and other obscure 80's flicks. i know the voyeuristic pleasures gained from the material offered. am i simply not hip to the saw experience? am i wrong for wanting an actual story line in a movie? or are others simply not viewing the better versions of the saw concept in its original form from decades ago? more importantly can't i simply view saw V because i own it? even if i enjoy it, it would only go to prove that i don't need to see any of the other films. or do i need to buy the other four and watch them first? as if to pretend that throwing millions of dollars in crap produces good material?
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
i'm going to pretend that i'm not sure where to begin.... but it's simple! i just received saw V from columbia house. while i recommend the company for what it offers, after you have done your required amount of films, i must say that from time to time i have issues. i certainly declined my directors selection, which was saw V, and i think that i could argue it or send it back. yet there must be a reason that they decided they would send it to me in spite of the fact that i didn't want it, and it's not the first... or twentyith time. surely they will say that i didn't decline, but my issues are bigger than that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment